|
|
|
Your
Ad Here
![]() |
|
Who’s Guarding The Guards? The Rumpled Critic If you’re looking for a slick cliff hanging, swivel headed, short-cut edited roller coaster ride of a conspiracy theory movie, this would be this one to see. Like his debut feature, 2003's S.W.A.T. starring Samuel L. Jackson and Colin Farrell, The Sentinel bears the hallmarks of Johnson's experience as a director: The director even takes a cameo, as a Secret Service agent whose murder gets the plot rolling. Unrelated to the novel by Arthur C. Clarke, the 1976 film, the 80s TV series of the same name or even to our humble newspaper, The Sentinel is based on the book by Gerald Petievich (who also wrote To Live and Die in L.A.). It apparently uses much the same story, although in the book Kiefer Sutherland’s name was “Martha.”
It turns out there’s a leak in the Secret Service concerning death threats to the President and career agent Pete Garrison is framed for treason. The president is played by David Rasche (Teddy Bears’ Picnic, Barbarians At The Gate), and, ironically, the sitcom actor best known for playing Sledge Hammer nearly twenty years ago seems so much more the man for the job than the one currently residing in the White House.
Fresh out of the academy, agent Jill Marin – played by Eva Longoria (Desperate Housewives, Harsh Times) becomes his partner after being a student of Garrison. Aside from the continual jokes concerning her cleavage, she is given very little to work with. Both female roles, Bassinger included, seem to be played down. It is almost like the testosterone was too high on the set, and a balance was in accordance. Unfortunately, sympathetic close up shots don’t constitute good acting in my books. Neither is how loud and angry one can read lines. Agent Marin remains the one sympathetic character toward the fugitive agent, doing field work for him while Breckinridge’s back is turned. There are many quick edits with rotating camera shots giving a sense of the agents’ perspective, lavish helicopter shots and a strobe light effect for added drama. Of course, I caught a couple of continuity errors: A garbage can has California serial numbers, and a small store which I recognized from Avenue of the Giants on Highway 101 in Northern California. When Garrison is forced to go on the run from his own people, risking his life to prove he's not behind the conspiracy to assassinate his girlfriend's husband, Breckinridge delivers this movie's equivalent of the Tommy Lee Jones’ “hard-target search” speech in The Fugitive, yet another movie of which The Sentinel will occasionally remind you. “He's smarter than you are, and he knows how you think,” Breckinridge tells the other agents. “You are chasing your worst nightmare” If it feels familiar, there’s a good reason. I kept having this déjà vu about every scene, catching myself remarking, “I remember this scene from another film.” This familiarity is a formula perfected in Hollywood to bait their audience into going out to view their film. But familiarity is why people watch the same characters do essentially the same things week after week on television. It's why some people go to church, some to bars, some to sports events and others to concerts. And this is also why people go to sequels. The movie industry sees Americans as sheep and not intelligent consumers, to which films like Good Night and Good Luck are rare exceptions. Just think of this as “In the Line of Fire XXIV.” Grade: C- David Giarrizzo is a writer, musician and Scene Editor for the Humboldt Sentinel. He can be reached at scene ~AT~~ humboldtsentinel.com.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright © 2005-08, Humboldt Sentinel. All rights reserved. |